Skip to content
nonconvexcard

Non-convex gradient descent reaches an approximate stationary point

ProofIntermediate⏱ 30 minOptimizationnon-convexstationary pointrate

Problem

Let ff be LL-smooth and bounded below by f⋆f^\star. Prove that gradient descent with η=1/L\eta = 1/L satisfies

min⁡0≤s<t∥∇f(xs)∥2≤2L(f(x0)−f⋆)t.\min_{0\le s<t}\|\nabla f(x_s)\|_2 \le \sqrt{\frac{2L(f(x_0)-f^\star)}{t}} .

Then state three things this does not establish, with a concrete example for one of them.

Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.

Solution

Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.

Related problems

All problems
SolvedProblemFieldTypeDifficultyTime
The exact step-size threshold on a quadraticOptimizationProofBeginner15 min
Linear convergence under strong convexityOptimizationProofIntermediate30 min
Measure the covariance estimation rate runHigh-Dim StatisticsCodingIntermediate1 hour
SGD on convex Lipschitz objectivesSGDProofIntermediate30 min
Why exactly one factor starts at zeroFine-TuningProofIntermediate30 min