Rademacher projections work too
ProofAdvanced⏱ 1 hourHigh-Dim Probabilityjlrademachersub-gaussiandatabase-friendly
Problem
Let have i.i.d. entries with Rademacher signs. Prove that for a fixed unit ,
for an absolute constant . Where does the proof differ from the Gaussian case, and what is gained in practice?
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Hints
Hints — 0 of 3 revealed
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson–Lindenstrauss dimension arithmetic | High-Dim Probability | Numerical | 15 min | ||
| The psi-2 norm of a Rademacher sign | High-Dim Probability | Numerical | 15 min | ||
| From distance preservation to inner-product preservation | High-Dim Probability | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Implement random projection and measure the distortion run | High-Dim Probability | Coding | 1 hour | ||
| Moments from tail bounds via the layer-cake formula | Probability | Proof | 30 min |