Rewards are identifiable only up to a prompt-dependent shift
ProofIntermediate⏱ 30 minLLMsidentifiabilitybradley-terryinvariance
Problem
Show that and induce identical Bradley–Terry likelihoods, and that they induce identical KL-regularised optimal policies. What does this imply about interpreting reward-model scores?
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The DPO gradient is a weighted contrastive step | LLMs | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Closed form of the KL-regularised RL optimum abyss | LLMs | Proof | 1 hour | ||
| Derive the DPO objective abyss | LLMs | Proof | 1 hour |