From moment growth to a tail bound
ProofAdvanced⏱ 1 hourHigh-Dim Probabilitymomentstailsequivalence
Problem
Suppose for all . Prove directly (without going through the MGF) that
for an absolute constant and all .
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Hints
Hints — 0 of 3 revealed
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The psi-2 norm of a Rademacher sign | High-Dim Probability | Numerical | 15 min | ||
| A variable with all moments finite that is not sub-Gaussian | High-Dim Probability | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Moments from tail bounds via the layer-cake formula | Probability | Proof | 30 min | ||
| The psi-2 norm of a Gaussian | High-Dim Probability | Numerical | 15 min | ||
| The soft-margin SVM is regularised hinge-loss minimisation | Classical ML | Proof | 30 min |