Newton's method is affine invariant
ProofIntermediate⏱ 30 minAdvanced Optimizationnewtonaffine invarianceconditioning
Problem
Let be invertible and . Show that the Newton iterates of from are exactly times those of from , and that no analogous statement holds for gradient descent. Explain the consequence for step-size tuning.
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frobenius versus operator norm for random matrices | Random Matrices | Numerical | 30 min | ||
| Implement ridge and find the optimal lambda run | Classical ML | Coding | 1 hour | ||
| IRLS is a weighted least-squares solve | Classical ML | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Conjugate gradient and Krylov optimality | Advanced Optimization | Proof | 1 hour | ||
| Local quadratic convergence of Newton's method | Advanced Optimization | Proof | 1 hour |