The geometry of l1 versus l2 constraints
ProofIntermediate⏱ 30 minHigh-Dim Statisticslassogeometrysparsityconvex envelope
Problem
- Describe the extreme points of the ball in and of the ball.
- Explain, using the fact that a linear functional over a compact convex set attains its maximum at an extreme point, why -constrained problems produce sparse solutions and -constrained ones do not.
- Show that is the convex envelope of on the unit ball, i.e. the largest convex function below it there.
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The geometric margin | Classical ML | Proof | 15 min | ||
| Derive the soft-thresholding operator | High-Dim Statistics | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Covering numbers of the set of sparse unit vectors | High-Dim Probability | Proof | 1 hour | ||
| Gaussian width of the sphere and of the sparse set | High-Dim Probability | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Implement ISTA and verify the lasso rate run | High-Dim Statistics | Coding | 3 hours |