AdaBoost as exact line search on the exponential loss
ProofAdvanced⏱ 30 minClassical MLadaboostexponential losscoordinate descentline search
Problem
Show that minimising over , with , gives where is the weighted error, and that the weight update in AdaBoost is exactly the re-normalisation of after the step.
Write a complete argument. Every inequality you use should be one you could state precisely.
Solution
Opening this before you have a real attempt on paper is the fastest way to feel like you understand something you cannot reproduce.
Related problems
All problems| Solved | Problem | Field | Type | Difficulty | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concave impurity gives non-negative information gain | Classical ML | Proof | 30 min | ||
| Gradient boosting fits the negative functional gradient | Classical ML | Proof | 30 min | ||
| The bagging variance formula | Classical ML | Proof | 30 min | ||
| AdaBoost drives training error to zero exponentially | Classical ML | Proof | 1 hour | ||
| Gradient descent with exact line search on a quadratic | Optimization | Proof | 1 hour |